However, exactly as in 1929-1933, there is a lack in simple solutions able to quickly determine a recovery, the state's intervention being considered now, as then, a life buoy.
Analyzing the evolution of the Romanian economy in the first half of the year, Prof. Pencea sees some recovery signals, such as a 75% decrease of the current account deficit or the doubling of automotive export, but also enough problems that hinder economic Romania in a relatively short period, such as the inability to apply tax cuts, a classical anti-crisis action, since Romania already has low taxation compared to other EU Member States. However, Prof. Pencea argues that public expenditure is needed more than most other actions, and should be easy to implement, since European funds absorption is at a very low 7% of the available money.











